Thanks, but going by the article link/title, I thought the mir maker was left poor behind in dust (genius starving in attic, that kind of line) while some evil capitalists profited from his original work.. and justice was done and finally, maybe due to winning some court suite, also got to see some profits after all these years...
However the story is about going from being very rich to being super rich. And he takes mir in its 4th edition in the direction most of us here don't approve of, crass commercialization. Mind you the article is from 2021 when crypto currencies were on the wild rise but this year the story is exactly opposite, wild losses wherever you look. But I don't feel sorry for the guy. Only interesting is to see who was responsible for the game we all played in its second edition in 2001.
www.straitstimes.com
