Ive been hearing rumors that most windows programs dont work properly with a 64bit processor, can anyone shine some light on this for me please?
R3mix said:Ive been hearing rumors that most windows programs dont work properly with a 64bit processor, can anyone shine some light on this for me please?
R3mix said:Ive been hearing rumors that most windows programs dont work properly with a 64bit processor, can anyone shine some light on this for me please?
AlphaTrace said:32bit apps will NOT run on a true dedicated 64bit processor, however all current consumer 64bit processors, are not truely 64bit. Instead they have an extra layer which enables them to process 32bit code (hence how people can use Win 9x+XP on Athlon64's).
Therefore any rumours you have heard, are most likely untrue.
Promotion?Viola A.I. said:He's just wanting to milk you for cash and sell you old produce they need to get rid of and that he'll get a bonus from selling (can't remember the word).
Wittin said:Promotion?
AlphaTrace said:Its not "true" unless the 32bit layer is non-existant.
I was about to buy a 64bit processor and a new motherboard, and the guy in the shop said i should wait for a good couple of months because Most windows programs will not run properly on a 64 Bit Processor.
urbanfox said:The 32bit layer is added for the consumer because we have no 64bit soho o/s yet. And yes it is "true" becuase it can run/do anything else that any other 64bit cpu can do based on 64bit instructions.
AlphaTrace said:So by the same analogy, are you saying Windows NT 3.51 (with SP5) is a true 32bit OS? As it can run plenty of 32bit apps, including Word 97, even though its a DOS based OS, like the consumer versions of windows from the time.
Lets look at it from a different view using your analogy. A man has all the male parts, but also has female parts to ease adoption for the ahem, desktop market. Is he a "true" male? Afterall, he can do everything a normal male can do based on male parts.
Viola said:They'll most probably leave the backward compatability in, why lose an expanded piece of hardware and risk profit loss through failed consumer manipulation?
AlphaTrace said:So by the same analogy, are you saying Windows NT 3.51 (with SP5) is a true 32bit OS? As it can run plenty of 32bit apps, including Word 97, even though its a DOS based OS, like the consumer versions of windows from the time.
Lets look at it from a different view using your analogy. A man has all the male parts, but also has female parts to ease adoption for the ahem, desktop market. Is he a "true" male? Afterall, he can do everything a normal male can do based on male parts.
¤]´)÷¤--§îr Äürøñ--¤÷(`[¤ said:<rant>
Actually, you're entirely wrong. WinNT, as of ALL versions, is ENTIRELY 32bit, with 16bit emulation. Look into it's history. Starting with NT 3.1 (which i still have a copy of :P) Plug: http://toastytech.com/guis/nt31.html
Tell me, if the A64s aren't true 64bit, and they can't be true 32bit according to your truth, then what ARE they?
If you want to proove yourself, tell this forum the true power of the Ps2.
Your analogy should be corrected to the following.
If a man had all man parts, but could also think like a woman - does that make him a true man?
Put simply - yes.
--
As for the fool with his 64bit "non-compatibility". Sue him. I mean it. Sue the hell out of him. False advertising.
Let me guess - he tried to make you buy a more expensive Pentium 4, right?
--
</rant>
urbanfox said:Me and Auron like Starsky and Hutch BIATCH!!!
Now auron will never talk to me again cus associated my bad self with him :slicendic
FREE PIZZA FOR ME
¤]´)÷¤--§îr Äürøñ--¤÷(`[¤ said:<rant>
Let me guess - he tried to make you buy a more expensive Pentium 4, right?
--
</rant>
¤]´)÷¤--§îr Äürøñ--¤÷(`[¤ said:Umm - you seen that film? I want the DVD
Of course i still love you urban ;p
AND SHARE THE PIZZA - BIATCH!!!
no o_o he said wait a couple of months before i buy =/