- Feb 18, 2005
- 586
- 0
- 122
lal shiitesDeposed Iraqi dictator is hanged for deaths of 148 Shiites in 1982
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/16389128/?GT1=8816
Discuss.
Last edited:
lal shiitesDeposed Iraqi dictator is hanged for deaths of 148 Shiites in 1982
How ****ing sad, i dont know but i feel remorse for this dictator. Why? Because he was around 70 and he was sentenced to a slow death, saddam himself said he would like to be shot instead, they denied it. I cant really talk as i dont know/experienced what the Iraqi people experienced during his reign of 'terror' as people put it. However how the old saying goes ... two wrongs dont make a right, what would the guy do if he was serving life in prison?.
And josh your a moron, you have the intelligence of a goat. Why would you like to see a person getting hanged? did you just say this to let people think your 'hardcore' in real life?. Anyways when you die, ill visit you and piss on your grave. And in regards to your last comment, i am 100% you have no clue what he even done, you just connect the guy to 9/11 as most people do, and think he was as bin laden. Anyways im not saying the guy wasnt scum but none the less your an idiot.
How ****ing sad, i dont know but i feel remorse for this dictator. Why? Because he was around 70 and he was sentenced to a slow death, saddam himself said he would like to be shot instead, they denied it.
How ****ing sad, i dont know but i feel remorse for this dictator. Why? Because he was around 70 and he was sentenced to a slow death, saddam himself said he would like to be shot instead, they denied it. I cant really talk as i dont know/experienced what the Iraqi people experienced during his reign of 'terror' as people put it. However how the old saying goes ... two wrongs dont make a right, what would the guy do if he was serving life in prison?.
And josh your a moron, you have the intelligence of a goat. Why would you like to see a person getting hanged? did you just say this to let people think your 'hardcore' in real life?. Anyways when you die, ill visit you and piss on your grave. And in regards to your last comment, i am 100% you have no clue what he even done, you just connect the guy to 9/11 as most people do, and think he was as bin laden. Anyways im not saying the guy wasnt scum but none the less your an idiot.
tbh peopling are starting to believe his not dead yet, lol and they faked it because videos on the net only show the bit where the rope gets tied around his neck not the acctually hanging.
George Bush has done just about as much damage (probebly more) than Saddam ever did.
Fair enough Saddam deserved it, but so does many more people in power, who quite frankly wont get hung.
Hyphocrits tbh..
/Tofas
George Bush didnt murder a village. Yes his actions have led to more Iraqis being killed (the cost of war) but Saddam needed to be removed and they werent killed because of a personal vendetta.
In a bizzare twist this is probably the only time ive ever been able to use my favoured word:
CHOKE
and actually have it on topic.
Note: Hanging isn't meant to be a slow death, and it probably wasn't. The drop is supposed to break your neck killing you near instantly. However in cases where the rope is too long/short, victims can end up struggling for ages, or the force is so hard the head breaks right off.
Either way he deserved it, he killed an entire village just because a group failed to assasinate him after he visited it. Also, hanging was something he 100% condoned, during his time in power, hangings took place as half time entertainment at football matches, and sometimes before and after them.
This is known as poetic justice.
agreed bothimo he should have been left to rot in a jail cell till he died, hanging him gave him a quick way out.
true.George Bush fought a war because he beleive saddam had Weapons of Mass Destruction, or the capabilities of producing them. Saddam was already a war mongerer, he declared war on neighbouring countries over petty matters.
The thing is, if it was left, and Saddam did have weapons etc, and he launched one, everyone would have been harping on with the "FFS he should have acted before this happened". In that situation the world would have invaded Iraq anyway, and the same outcome woudl have been reached. The difference is, a lot of countries would have had a lot of dead people.
George Bush fought a war because he beleive saddam had Weapons of Mass Destruction, or the capabilities of producing them. Saddam was already a war mongerer, he declared war on neighbouring countries over petty matters.
The thing is, if it was left, and Saddam did have weapons etc, and he launched one, everyone would have been harping on with the "FFS he should have acted before this happened". In that situation the world would have invaded Iraq anyway, and the same outcome woudl have been reached. The difference is, a lot of countries would have had a lot of dead people.