well its come down to a gateway and a asus laptop that i have seen but i would like to know what u guys would say is the best brand of the 2 and what u what u would class as a good brand to buy thanks ^_^
Laptop brands
- Thread starter AgentSmith
- Start date
I don't know why anyone would buy a laptop based soley on brand. If that were the case, everyone would be walking around with iBook/Powerbooks.
Buy your laptop based on what you need.
/Leo
Buy your laptop based on what you need.
/Leo
Perfect responce thankyou, this was just trying show some one that the brand has no affect because i bought a dual core p m core for cheaper than his "celeron M" and mine has a 17" HD screen. he tryed to say that his was still worth it becaue its asus
- Jul 20, 2004
- 5,258
- 3
- 295
...but IBM don't make laptops :P
----
Brands really don't matter unless it comes to price. Reputation matters, and this is sometimes associated with a brand. More often than not however, a 'brand' is just a leverage factor when it comes to price setting.
You could argue that X brand is 'better' because it cost more. Although that wouldn't mean the laptops spec was any better
.
/Leo
----
Brands really don't matter unless it comes to price. Reputation matters, and this is sometimes associated with a brand. More often than not however, a 'brand' is just a leverage factor when it comes to price setting.
You could argue that X brand is 'better' because it cost more. Although that wouldn't mean the laptops spec was any better
./Leo
Last edited:
I wouldnt purchase ether of these brand of laptops, as there has been a lot of hardware issues with regards to them.
- Jul 20, 2004
- 5,258
- 3
- 295
- Jul 20, 2004
- 5,258
- 3
- 295
My statement was actually correct if you want to start picking on details!
Fujitsu siemens can still be compared with IBM because even if the laptops NOW come under the Lenovo brand there are still IBM laptops around.
Fujitsu siemens can still be compared with IBM because even if the laptops NOW come under the Lenovo brand there are still IBM laptops around
.
If your statement is to be viewed as time specific, then it has no relevance to what I said . I never qualified MY statement as in the past, but rather, presently.
/Leo
. I never qualified MY statement as in the past, but rather, presently./Leo
- Jul 20, 2004
- 5,258
- 3
- 295
In that case, your post didn't have any relevance to mine in the first placeIf your statement is to be viewed as time specific, then it has no relevance to what I said
/Leo
.Actually, nevermind. I've confused myself now.
Damn English for mother toungue people!
Last edited: