- Jul 4, 2003
- 1,029
- 3
- 195
I understand almost everything going on, except the ****ed up timeline. The "Future Timeline" as in the one that occured when they didnt save Clare doesnt make sense:
Basically shortly after Hiro landed in the future, the future Hiro said the point in time he had to go back to was the point in the train, but he never actually went back there, and then was killed at the end of the episode.
Despite this Clare is still alive in the future, and Sylar still has her power. The Theory that Sylar managed to get the part of her brain that has the power and she regenerated after doesn't make sense because without that part of her brain she cant regenerate.
Sylar has clare's power and has survived the stabbing by Hiro,and Clare is still alive. Peter can't have saved Clare, because he has a scar which he wouldn't have with her powers.
So "Future Hiro" can't actually get back to change the past, Clare has still been saved but peter doesn't have and Sylar does. It all kinda doesn't make sense :/
Basically shortly after Hiro landed in the future, the future Hiro said the point in time he had to go back to was the point in the train, but he never actually went back there, and then was killed at the end of the episode.
Despite this Clare is still alive in the future, and Sylar still has her power. The Theory that Sylar managed to get the part of her brain that has the power and she regenerated after doesn't make sense because without that part of her brain she cant regenerate.
Sylar has clare's power and has survived the stabbing by Hiro,and Clare is still alive. Peter can't have saved Clare, because he has a scar which he wouldn't have with her powers.
So "Future Hiro" can't actually get back to change the past, Clare has still been saved but peter doesn't have and Sylar does. It all kinda doesn't make sense :/