Ok, lets put the crappy rumours and conspiracy theories to bed, along with the children spreading them.
1. If America wanted to take down the WTC themselves, they could have done it far easier AND made themselves out to be awesome. IF they wanted to blow up the WTC they would have planted bombs, not involved aeroplanes at all, then they would have notified the towers of the bomb threat, evacuated and then blown the towers to the floor.
This would ensure no loss of lives, still give them a reason to go to war AND they would have been able to claim they have awesome intelligence since they "intercepted" these bombs and saved hundreds of lives. This would have resulted in a BETTER war backing and less pressure on the government. It would also have made life easier as they wouldnt have to answer any question about how they got their intelligence as it would be classified.
2. By saying America attacked the WTC, your also saying Britain attacked itself with the London Bombings. I thought it was reatrded enough when people claimed France were behind it. As we all know Britain DIDNT commit the london bombings against itself because we had the good fortune of damning evidence.
3. Could someone please exaplin how the American Government managed to plant tonnes of explosives inside the WTC without anyone leaking the information and without anyone getting suspicious? You cant sneak a load of explosives into 2 towers even over a period of time.
4. If they did want to blow up the towers, kill all those people and cause mass destruction. Then the Bombs OR the plane would have been sufficient, you dont need both.
5. Windows further down explode beccuase of the pressure of the collapse above. Every supporting pillar inside would be slightly different, causing some to collapse while others stood, the force of the implosion as it mvoes down would have hapilly blown out a few of the weaker windows, a well placed bomb blast would blow out more than a single window. Other possible causes are radioators exploding under the immense pressure, even fire exstinguishers or others compressed gas cylinders would explode under the heat, blowing out a window or two. Bomb blasts would blow out a row of windows and put an unmissable hole in the side of the building.
6. The war on iraq was about WMD. Or as some clever people like to claim, petrol prices. Eitehr way, it doesnt matter, the US and UK stated it was about WMD and went in on that claim. They didnt need to blow up themsevles, London or the WTC to invade Iraq, they already had a reason to go in.
Afghanistan has **** all to offer the US, zero, the country is actually ****, theres no political, financial, or economical gain from invading that country.
FINALLY: I can understand people dont like war, and that they think the war was about oil prices and lining the USA's pockets, i must say if i drink 8 litres of cider and have a truck drive into my head i can see their point of veiw. However i cant beleive anyone is stupid enough to think America attacked itself.
This conversation is creating a vacuum of intelligence (like space is a vacuum) and that vacuum will soon implode pulling the intelligence of everyone who is reading into the void to fill it. So can i ask for this to be locked removed and deleted before it actually sucks the intelligence out of people.
Ps. Maybe they blew up the WTC becuase someone found photo's that confirmed the American government is stiking a secret deal with the Loch Ness monster and the Martians to invade Neptune. These are the same martians that helped build the fake moonlanding site in 1944, that year America put the World Clocks forward 25 years so the moonlanding could be broadcast on colour TV that was also invented in the REAL 1969
/sarcasm
/Atomicide.
